May 2, 2025
Reception & Presentations 2pm to 5pm
Cal Poly Humboldt Library
Search Presenters & Abstracts
Presenters & Abstracts: Search
Effects of a Race Timer on the 3 Minute All Out Test for Critical Power
Paul Mandell
Kinesiology
Graduate Student
College of Professional Studies
The 3 Minute all-out Test (3MT) provides a lens with which to gain insight on an individual's performance capabilities by measuring both anaerobic capacity and maximal aerobic capacity in one short test. The 3MT measures maximal performance based on the assumption that the subject is giving the test maximal effort. However due to the design of the 3MT, test participants may not be able to accurately gauge their perceived exertion, which could potentially affect performance outcomes during testing. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of introducing a race timer to the 3MT on performance outcomes in healthy active males, and also carries the potential to refine the 3MT.
Hormonal Factors Impacting Women's Relationship Jealousy
Hannah Ferguson
Psychology
Graduate Student
Jennifer Masad
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Steven Bowman
Psychology
Graduate Student
Danielle Siegel
Psychology
Graduate Student
Amanda Hahn
Psychology
Faculty
College of Professional Studies
Previous research has suggested that the use of hormonal contraception affects women’s feelings of relationship jealousy. Combined oral contraceptive use, in partnered women, has been linked to an increase in reported feelings of relationship jealousy, especially among women using a high-estrogen dose pill formulation. While the pill is one of the most widely used forms of hormonal contraception, many health care professionals now encourage young women to use progesterone-only contraceptives. This study compares reported relationship jealousy in women using the pill and women using long lasting, progesterone-only contraceptives using Buunk’s (1997) relationship jealousy scale.
Context-Specific Effects of Facial Dominance and Trustworthiness on Leadership Judgments
Hannah Ferguson
Psychology
Graduate Student
Maria Sepulveda
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Amanda Hahn
Psychology
Faculty
College of Professional Studies
Social judgments of faces predict important social outcomes, including leadership decisions. Some studies have even linked these face preferences to actual election outcomes, within one second using just facial cues. Facial dominance and trustworthiness have context-specific effects on leadership decisions, with facial cues linked to dominance being preferred in hypothetical wartime scenarios and facial cues linked to trustworthiness being preferred in hypothetical peacetime scenarios. Here, we report a conceptual replication of Spisak et al. (2012), using only female faces that vary naturally in perceived trustworthiness and dominance.
Boobs and Beakers: Gender-Science Stereotypes Predict Implicit Attitudes Toward Women in Science
Hannah Ferguson
Psychology
Graduate Student
Benjamin P. Skillman
Psychology
Graduate Student
Danielle Siegel
Psychology
Graduate Student
Desiree Garcia
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Kimberly Vazquez
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Kierra Boykin
Psychology
Graduate Student
Christopher Aberson
Psychology
Faculty
James Peabody
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
College of Professional Studies
Women have always faced discrimination , but have made great strides, particularly in the workforce. Though more women are entering male dominated fields, these jobs are still seen as inherently male. Specifically, STEM fields have been slow to integrate women into its elite ranks. The field of sciences are traditionally male dominated and associated with masculinity. This is mostly attributable to sociocultural influences rather than biological differences or ability. Stronger implicit association of men with science promotes differences in academic and career outcomes. The current study aims to investigate gender differences in the masculine association with science.
It Gets Better: Policy Changes Predict Implicit Bias Against Homosexuality
Danielle Siegel
Psychology
Graduate Student
Ben Skillman
Psychology
Graduate Student
Hannah Ferguson
Psychology
Graduate Student
Desiree Garcia
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
College of Professional Studies
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of policy changes on people's implicit biases about gay people. Participants completed an online IAT task that measures implicit favoritism for gay vs. straight people. A time series analysis indicates that the average monthly implicit favoritism score (for straight over gay people) decreased following the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States. This suggests reduced favoritism for heterosexuals over gay and lesbian people, b = - 0.83, t(164) = -18.74, p < .001. As predicted, people exhibited less implicit bias against homosexuality after the legalization of gay marriage.
Predicting Support for Atypical Leaders Under Conditions of Uncertainty
Dennis A Estrada
Psychology
Graduate Student
Ben Skillman
Psychology
Graduate Student
Vilay Phimmasorn
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Haley Carter
Psychology
Graduate Student
Al Newman
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Jaz Mendez
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Lily Syfers
Psychology
Amber M. Gaffney
Psychology
Faculty
David E. Rast III
Psychology
College of Professional Studies
People support leaders who embody the traits of their group (Hogg, 2001).
However, previous research suggests that non-prototypical political leaders can also gain support when
constituents are uncertain about their identity (Gaffney, Rast, Hogg, 2018; Rast, Gaffney, Hogg,
& Crisp, 2011; Hogg, 2001). This can be problematic as identity uncertainty predicts support for autocratic leaders (Rast, Hogg, Giessner, 2013). Therefore, further understanding of the factors involved in support for leaders under conditions of uncertainty is
important. The present study attempts to extend previous research by examining support for leaders under conditions of uncertainty.
Healthy Youth, Healthy Communities
Felicia J Stansbury
Social Work
Graduate Student
College of Professional Studies
Our goal is to demonstrate the importance of connection between the natural environment, community, individuals, and wellness. We are creating a curriculum to provide a non-traditional prevention/intervention program of outdoor, wilderness activities for youth in the Southern Humboldt region. It is important to note, Ecological Systems Theory is the foundational framework for this project. The ecosystemic perspective is a way of thinking and organizing knowledge that emphasizes the interrelatedness and interdependency between individuals and social systems (Waller 2001). The purpose of our work; promoting healthy activities for youth in order to foster a healthier community.
Hell Bent on Consent
Al Newman
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Heather Reynolds
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Edith Gomez
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Indiana Murillo
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Cameron Carpenter
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Akacia Marks
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Benjamin Graham
Psychology
Faculty
College of Professional Studies
On college campuses, the topic of sexual consent has received much attention over the past 15 years. Consent is a multifaceted term, and can incorporate an internal state of willingness, an act of explicitly agreeing to something, and behavior that someone else interprets as consent (Muehlenhard et al., 2016). Despite the attention to sexual consent within higher education, it is unknown whether or not this trend is reflected in human sexuality textbooks. The current study involved a content analysis of how the construct of sexual consent is represented in five major human sexuality textbooks in terms of location, definition, scope, and context.
Threat Appraisals: Mediator of Acculturative Stress and Wellbeing Among Armenian Americans
Hayley Roberts
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Shaun Aksionczyk
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Tsolak M. Kirakosyan
Psychology
Graduate Student
Maria I. Iturbide
Psychology
Faculty
College of Professional Studies
Acculturative stress is the stress experienced by individuals when they are in the process of reconciling two or more cultures (i.e., their heritage culture and a new culture). Research suggests that stress is linked to individuals’ wellbeing. Moreover, wellbeing linked to acculturative stress may be explained by threat appraisal (i.e., how individuals perceive stress - as anxiety-provoking and unmanageable). The current study examines threat appraisal as a mediator of the relationship between acculturative stress and wellbeing amongst a community sample of Armenian Americans.
Examining Validity of the Multidimensional Acculturative Stress Inventory Adapted for Armenian Americans
Giselle Velasquez
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Miami Liscano
Psychology
Undergraduate Student
Bernardo Sosa-Rosales
Psychology
Graduate Student
Tsolak Michael Kirakosyan
Psychology
Graduate Student
Dr. Maria I Iturbide, Ph.D
Psychology
Faculty
College of Professional Studies
Acculturative stress is experienced when individuals go through the process of acculturation
(i.e., reconciling two or more cultures). Previous research has used the Multidimensional
Acculturative Stress Inventory (MASI) to assess this stress. However, the measure has only
been used with a limited number of ethnic groups. The current study examines the factor
structure of the MASI with a community sample of Armenian Americans.